
Yawn. Unfortunately, I now begin to suspect that there is no "there" there. There is only this, and this is all there is.
More revelations and behind-the-scenes to be found here, and here including model shots of the actress, and other celeb style who-gives-a-damn (...as if this is a "real" series - and I suppose, in a way, it is, huh? Which is the bigger story behind this project. But we'll get back to that later.).
Needless to say, the trick may be done. And a rather lame magician they proved to be - nice entrance, lame finish. No big flourish to come. Go home.

Hopefully the next guys up to bat will harness all the willing attention and public passion and squeeze some greater purpose out of it.
By the way...who noticed that NY Times has a "Screens" blogger on staff whose charged with "finding, reviewing and making sense of all those senseless new images: web video, viral video, user-driven video, custom interactive video, embedded video ads, web-based VOD, broadband television, diavlogs, vcasts, vlogs, video podcasts, mobisodes, webisodes, mashups and more." Yay, NYT!
No comments:
Post a Comment